While we’d all love to see Stan Van Gundy stalking the sidelines for an NBA team this season rather than sitting at home after getting fired by the Orlando Magic back in May, most NBA fans have been very excited by the prospect of the famously irascible coach joining ESPN’s “NBA Countdown” broadcast. The rumor, first reported last month by Sports by Brooks , that Van Gundy would add his strategic smarts and acerbic wit to a studio show that often seems like it could use more of both seemed inspired, and maybe too good to be true.
So it was kind of a bummer (if not a shock) to read Wednesday that an ESPN spokesman had told Jason McIntyre of The Big Lead that SVG and the Worldwide Leader “differed on potential assignments and we moved in another direction.” While failing to come to terms with ESPN doesn’t preclude Van Gundy from finding other TV work, the EJ-Kenny-Charles-Shaq squad at TNT doesn’t seem to have much room for new blood and saddling up with Rick Kamla nightly on NBA TV doesn’t seem like something the ex-coach would be too interested in (though I know Eric Freeman would love it). Less than three weeks left before Opening Night, this could mean no big-time national gig for Stan heading into the regular season, which would be disappointing for anyone interested in seeing and hearing more SVG (READ: any right-thinking individual).
McIntyre notes that ESPN is a broadcast partner of the NBA, with the network paying nearly $1 billion for the right to show NBA content, and wonders whether Van Gundy’s longstanding frostiness (and, in more recent settings like this ESPN.com podcast , outright animus) toward NBA Commissioner David Stern had something to do with the scuttling of the deal. (Van Gundy’s also had less-than-kind words for an ESPN personality in the recent past, too.)
It all seemed like the kind of inside baseball that media types find interesting, but doesn’t really go anywhere after the fact. Except that, after the fact, Van Gundy did go somewhere — to “The Dan LeBatard Show” on Miami sports radio station 790 The Ticket, where (at about the 28-minute mark) he discussed the TBL report with his trademark tact, reserve and hahahahaha, no, just kidding, he broke out the napalm.
Van Gundy called the ESPN spokesperson’s account “just a flat-out lie,” said he hadn’t gotten a straight answer on what happened “nobody there has the guts to say anything,” and much more. From McIntyre’s transcript of that portion of the interview :
It is very well known that the working relationship between star center Dwight Howard and head coach Stan Van Gundy did not end well in Orlando. SVG said that Howard was trying to get him fired , Howard issued several complaints that SVG would make his actions public, Van Gundy was fired , and Dwight left in trade . All things considered, it was pretty much the worst possible resolution to the issues.
On the bright side, not all has been lost in the relationship between the two men. Currently, they’re teaming up to do substantive good for Florida schools. From Mike Bianchi for the Orlando Sentinel (via EOB ):
If you read my column last week , you know Van Gundy is the chairman of a political group in Seminole County called Citizens for Preservation of Property Values. The goal of the group is to increase property taxes in Seminole County to help preserve the area’s traditionally strong public school system — a system that has been decimated by $73 million in budget cuts over the past five years. In the Nov. 6 general election, Seminole voters will decide whether to approve a 1-mill increase in property taxes for four years beginning a year from now. The increase would bring in as much as $25 million annually to the school district.
Van Gundy says Dwight, who was recently traded to the Lakers, is going to lend some financial backing to the cause. ”Dwight has pledged his support,” Van Gundy said Monday during an interview on our Open Mike radio show on 740 The Game. “He’s a resident of Seminole County, and he’s keeping his house here. I think his history will show that he’s had great concern for kids in the Central Florida community. With him still living here, we asked him to help and he didn’t hesitate.”
Surprisingly to some, both Stan and Dwight say they are on good terms and have been communicating regularly over the last several weeks. Van Gundy even texted Howard and wished him good luck after he was traded to L.A.
It is typically considered good form to forgive and forget, and so we must give credit to SVG and Howard for working together to help others. Still, it’s surprising that they could put all this behind them after some truly ugly action in Orlando. On the other hand, both seem to be happier now, and maybe that’s all that matters.
[Also: Orlando Magic fan sues franchise over use of her image in ads ]
It’s a cliche to say that squabbles like the ones Van Gundy and Howard had in Orlando are “just business,” but that seems to be their point of view in this case. Personally, I’m not sure that I could have seen past the arguments of the past, particularly if I’d been fired as a result. It’s unlikely that these two are best friends these days, but it’s also genuinely impressive that they were able to move on and do good for others. Dwight Howard has often looked like a child during this ordeal, but he deserves credit here for putting the past aside and doing good for the kids.
Outside the Game from Yahoo! Sports:
Other popular content on the Yahoo! network:
• Outside the Game: Lamarr Woodley gives back to his Michigan hometown
• Dana White’s breakneck lifestyle not going to stop anytime soon, health be damned
• Y! Finance: 8 things the iPhone 5 still can’t do
• Brian Kelly seems like he might be, finally, the right coach for Notre Dame
![]()
The Chicago Bulls have an unquestioned superstar in Derrick Rose. But in an era where NBA stars are ganging up for shots at championships, can Rose bring another ring to Chicago without a fellow star to help?
History doesn’t support a “yes” answer, but there are a few signs for optimism.
First off, it’s rare in the NBA for a superstar to win without a fellow All-Star, or at least an exceptionally talented second option. Bill Russell had John Havlicek. Larry Bird had Kevin McHale and Robert Parish. Kareem Adul-Jabbar had Oscar Robertson and then Magic Johnson. Even the great Michael Jordan needed Scottie Pippen.
Even worse news for Rose’s championship hopes is the star studded teams being assembled around him. The Miami Heat possess a big three of LeBron James, Dwayne Wade and Chris Bosh. The Oklahoma City Thunder have Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook and James Harden. The Los Angeles Lakers may be one of the oldest teams in the league, but they’re contenders with Kobe Bryant, Dwight Howard and Pau Gasol.
With the current NBA landscape, it doesn’t look good for contenders in the “one superstar” model, and that includes Rose and the Bulls. Looking at the past 20 champions (viewable here thanks to nba.com), the only winners who didn’t have two or more surefire “star” level players were the Dallas Mavericks (2010-11) and the Detroit Pistons (2003-04).
Chicago has built a very solid team that, if healthy, could go deep into the playoffs. As they are, without giving Rose a consistent second option, they cannot be considered favorites.
Carlos Boozer has disappointed since he signed his lavish contract three summers ago. Luol Deng may be a star defensively, but he isn’t the scorer Chicago needs and is coming off his worst scoring season since his rookie year. Unless one of the two shines this season without Rose in the lineup (he is expected back in March, according to K.C. Johnson of the Chicago Tribune) they could both see themselves shipped out of town in an effort to snag a second option next offseason.
If the Bulls clear both off the books (using the amnesty clause on Boozer and trading Deng), they’d be players in the 2013 free-agency class.
![]()
If Rose doesn’t get that second star, is it possible that the hometown hero could leave Chicago? Former Orlando Magic coach Stan Van Gundy made his opinions clear while talking with AM-740′s “The Game” in Orlando. “I think the interesting one coming up in the future is going to be Derrick Rose,” Van Gundy said. “…he’s got good players around him, very good players around him, but if (the Bulls) can’t get another star there for him is he eventually going to look around and say, ‘Hey, I’ve got to work this out on my own and I’ve got to find somehow to get somewhere else so that I will have a chance to play with another star.’ The league has changed.”
Of course, it’s easy to pass Van Gundy’s words as bitter since he was let go by the Magic this summer in an effort to appease star center Dwight Howard. Even so, it’s hard to ignore the logic. Any team with one superstar likely dreads the potential of losing that player because they can’t get him another big name to play with. It happened in Cleveland with LeBron, it happened in Toronto with Chris Bosh, it happened in Orlando with Howard… but could it happen with Chicago with Rose?
While it’s hard to be anywhere near concrete with these kinds of things, Rose himself should give the Bulls fans optimism. Rose is a quiet superstar, a force of nature who thrives on the court and is mostly silent off of it.
In a league with showmen like LeBron and Howard, Rose’s silent determination is almost refreshing. Everything about Rose’s career so far speaks of utter loyalty to the city and the team (when he is introduced in games, he is “from Chicago” rather than from his former college of Memphis) and nothing he has said should cause any concern.
Another big reason for optimism is the presence of Tom Thibodeau, who has emerged as one of the top coaches in the NBA. While he cannot spin straw into gold, he gets the best of out his players and has developed Chicago into the top defensive squad in the NBA. As long as he is their coach, the Bulls will be a top team, and Rose will have more reason to stay.
If Rose returns completely healthy, Chicago will resume its spot amongst the NBA elite. They may not be contenders on level with Oklahoma City, Miami or the Los Angeles Lakers, but they’re up there. But can Rose win a championship in Chicago without another superstar? History says no, but that doesn’t mean Bulls fans should dread his departure.
Read more Chicago Bulls news on BleacherReport.com
The Chicago Bulls have an unquestioned superstar in Derrick Rose. But in an era where NBA stars are ganging up for shots at championships, can Rose bring another ring to Chicago without a fellow star to help?
History doesn’t support a yes answer, but there are a few signs for optimism.
First off, it’s rare in the NBA for a superstar to win without a fellow All-Star, or at least an exceptionally talented second option. Bill Russell had John Havlicek. Larry Bird had Kevin McHale and Robert Parish. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar had Oscar Robertson and then Magic Johnson. Even the great Michael Jordan needed Scottie Pippen.
Even worse news for Rose’s championship hopes is the star-studded teams being assembled around him. The Miami Heat possess a big three of LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh. The Oklahoma City Thunder have Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook and James Harden.
The Los Angeles Lakers may be one of the oldest teams in the league, but they’re contenders with Kobe Bryant, Dwight Howard and Pau Gasol.
With the current NBA landscape, it doesn’t look good for contenders in the “one superstar” model, and that includes Rose and the Bulls. Looking at the past 20 champions (viewable here thanks to nba.com), the only winners who didn’t have two or more surefire “star” level players were the Dallas Mavericks (2010-11) and the Detroit Pistons (2003-04).
Chicago has built a very solid team that, if healthy, could go deep into the playoffs. As they are, without giving Rose a consistent second option, they cannot be considered favorites.
Carlos Boozer has disappointed since he signed his lavish contract three summers ago. Luol Deng may be a star defensively, but he isn’t the scorer Chicago needs and is coming off his worst scoring season since his rookie year.
Unless one of the two shines this season without Rose in the lineup (he is expected back in March, according to K.C. Johnson of the Chicago Tribune) they could both see themselves shipped out of town in an effort to snag a second option next offseason. If the Bulls clear both off the books (using the amnesty clause on Boozer and trading Deng) they’d be players in the 2013 free-agency class.
If Rose doesn’t get that second star, is it possible that the hometown hero could leave Chicago? Former Orlando Magic coach Stan Van Gundy made his opinions clear while talking with AM-740′s “The Game” in Orlando.
“I think the interesting one coming up in the future is going to be Derrick Rose,” Van Gundy said. “…he’s got good players around him, very good players around him, but if (the Bulls) can’t get another star there for him is he eventually going to look around and say, ‘Hey, I’ve got to work this out on my own and I’ve got to find somehow to get somewhere else so that I will have a chance to play with another star.’ The league has changed.”
Of course, it’s easy to pass Van Gundy’s words as bitter since he was let go by the Magic this summer in an effort to appease star center Dwight Howard. Even so, it’s hard to ignore the logic. Any team with one superstar likely dreads the potential of losing that player because they can’t get him another big name to play with.
It happened in Cleveland with LeBron, it happened in Toronto with Chris Bosh, it happened in Orlando with Howard…but could it happen with Chicago with Rose?
While it’s hard to be anywhere near concrete with these kinds of things, Rose himself should give the Bulls fans optimism. Rose is a quiet superstar, a force of nature who thrives on the court and is mostly silent off of it. In a league with showmen like LeBron and Howard, Rose’s silent determination is almost refreshing.
Everything about Rose’s career so far speaks of utter loyalty to the city and the team (when he is introduced in games, he is “from Chicago,” rather than from his former college of Memphis) and nothing he has said should cause any concern.
Another big reason for optimism is the presence of head coach Tom Thibodeau, who has emerged as one of the top coaches in the NBA. While he cannot spin straw into gold, he gets the best of out his players and has developed Chicago into the top defensive squad in the NBA. As long as he is their coach, the Bulls will be a top team, and Rose will have more reason to stay.
If Rose returns completely healthy, Chicago will resume its spot amongst the NBA elite. They may not be contenders on level with Oklahoma City, Miami or the Los Angeles Lakers, but they’re up there. But can Rose win a championship in Chicago without another superstar? History says no, but that doesn’t mean Bulls fans should dread his departure.
Read more Chicago Bulls news on BleacherReport.com
Mike Woodson and Jeff Van Gundy share two main things in common. First of all, they both took over the Knicks during mid-season and then became the head coach the following season. Secondly, they’re both defensive-minded coaches.
Now, as Woodson is about to embark on his first full season with the Knicks, Van Gundy, who currently serves as an ESPN NBA analyst, provided his thoughts on the new head coach and the team to ESPNNewYork.com. Van Gundy also reflected on the defensive makeup of his Knicks teams.
Stan Van Gundy, after being fired, blasts Orlando Magic CEO Alex Martins’ ‘naiveté’ (Ball Don’t Lie)
When former Orlando Magic coach Stan Van Gundy “resigned” to spend more time with his family following the Heat’s slow start to the 2005-06 season, he took the high road after being replaced by Heat President Pat Riley, stepping aside silently in the wake of Shaquille O’Neal’s displeasure with SVG’s exacting ways while remaining on the Miami payroll. Stan was fired by the Magic in late May, and even though he’ll remain on the team’s payroll, and he’s not exactly taking the high and silent road this time around.
Lucky for us, his aim on the low road is absolutely spot on. In an interview with Orlando Sentinel scribe Mike Bianchi on Bianchi’s radio show , Van Gundy blasted newly ensconced Magic CEO Alex Martins for the embarrassing turn the team has made since Martins took over the position from the retiring Bob Vander Weide last winter.
“It’s a typical lack of understanding from someone who has no sports knowledge, who has never coached or played, who has never been in a locker room….it’s a naiveté,” Van Gundy said of Martins Monday morning on Mike Bianchi’s show on AM 740.
Former Orlando Magic coach Stan Van Gundy was critical of the team that fired him, claiming during a radio interview that Magic CEO Alex Martins had no knowledge of the game.
Pardon the preponderance of Chicago Bulls posts over the last few days, but the team is in such a unique and odd situation that we can’t help but stay fascinated over a franchise gone completely batty. Less than 100 days ago it was working with the league’s best record and reigning NBA MVP. Now the group is taking on criticism from all comers for its skinflint ways, despite being on pace to pay the luxury tax this season for a team that might not even make the playoffs. Not just the Finals or second round (a place the Bulls have been to just twice since 1998), but the playoff bracket altogether. With Derrick Rose out until possibly March or even April, and the real Derrick Rose probably over a year away from showing up, it’s worth considering.
Actually, if you’re Jeff Van Gundy speaking his mind on Chicago-area radio station ESPN 1000, you’re done considering. The Chicago Bulls, who had the best record in the NBA in 2010-11 and tied for the best record in 2012, are going to have “a heck of a year” if the Bulls even churn out a .500 record. A record that, if 2012 was any indication, would leave them out of the playoffs. Here’s JVG’s take :
“To lose Rose by itself is going to cost you — even if you thought they were a 55-win team with Rose — that costs you 12-15 games right there,” Van Gundy said. “And then all the other guys I think people are overlooking. C.J. Watson even with his poor play to Asik in that sixth game, listen, he was a very valuable back-up through all of Rose’s injuries last year. He played well, and now, who’s their backup, they have Hinrich and who? (Marquis Teague) No, no, he’s not … did you watch him in summer league? “Struggled” is being kind. That’s not a knock. The 29th pick in the draft is such a hit-and-miss selection anyway. You have to give him time to grow and mature. But to think he’s going to come in and play behind Hinrich next year …”
On the July 6 episode of ESPN’s sports talk program First Take, the panel discussed LeBron James’ new SLAM Magazine cover. On the cover, James is depicted triumphantly raising his arms (one holding his finals MVP trophy) with the headline “Hi Haters.” For James fans and supporters, it was both validation and vindication for James and the proudest professional moment for a player who has been so maligned for never having won a title before.
However, for some on the First Take panel, namely Rob Parker, James’ support of the cover via a tweet where he described the cover as “epic,” was plenty of reason to call James out for being too sensitive to media scrutiny.
“I absolutely hate this cover because it shows how sensitive LeBron has been about his entire journey,” said Parker. “I remember when Michael Jordan won his first title, he was criticized too, but he didn’t let the critics effect him the way James does.”
When Israel Gutierrez brings up Jordan’s Hall-of-Fame induction speech, where Jordan spent part of the time blasting some of his critics, Parker immediately changed the subject and continued his rant about James’ oversensitivity.
Parker’s words were also echoed by Charles Barkley last season on The Dan LeBatard Show, when he called out both Heat players and fans for being too concerned with what their critics were saying.
Now, I’m in no position to question Parker’s credentials as a journalist or sports expert. But my knowledge of the Michael Jordan era during his run with the Bulls both before and after NBA Finals success were filled with incidents that confirm Jordan’s sensitivity to criticism. These were incidents that went unmentioned in Parker’s assessment of Jordan’s “thick skin.”
![]()
Back in 1997, Jeff Van Gundy was coaching the New York Knicks (this was before ankle weight-gate and the Charlie Ward-P.J. Brown brawl). Prior to a game against the Bulls, he sounded off about how he felt that Jordan sought to befriend players before he tried to destroy them on the court. He even added that Jordan was a “con man” for good measure.
Jordan would go on to light the Knicks up for 51 points and offer some parting words in Van Gundy’s ear as he sauntered off. Obviously, the media portrayed Jordan’s response as “seeking motivation to give himself an edge.”
Ironically, this was similar to a recent statement Skip Bayless made about LeBron James in the NBA Finals. Bayless said that the reason James won the finals was because his friendship with Durant made Durant less aggressive in the mental and physical approach against James.
James barely gave these words a second thought, knowing that quite frankly criticizing LeBron James is essentially Bayless’ meal ticket at this point. However, contrast that with Jordan’s angry 51-point game, harsh words at Van Gundy and a later mention during his Hall-of-Fame acceptance speech when Jordan unloaded on several of his critics including Van Gundy.
Michael Jordan was one of the greatest players of all time and I can say pretty confidently, as a Heat fan, that James will probably never eclipse Jordan’s global impact on the NBA. But to say that Jordan “didn’t care what people said about him” absolutely ignores NBA History to an embarrassing degree.
One moment during his Hall of Fame speech he criticizes former Bulls general manager Jerry Krause. Bulls fans are very familiar with the statements and decisions Krause made during the Bulls’ second 3-peat between 1996-98, and he was often blamed for breaking the Bulls up early and forcing Phil Jackson, Jordan and Scottie Pippen to leave Chicago.
![]()
But why is Jordan bringing up a statement that Krause made 11-years earlier (“organizations win titles”) during one of the proudest moments of his post-playing life? Why is he still hanging onto this now? Can you image what the media would say if James brought up a statement made about him when he was still in high school? Parker and Bayless would be yelling from the rooftops about James’ thin skin.
Another incident was also in 1997. Jordan was set to play the Seattle SuperSonics in a regular season game and Sonics coach George Karl said that Jordan “had become a jump shooter and was afraid of contact” In other words, Jordan could not handle physical play. Not surprisingly, Jordan had a huge 45-point game and said that “[Karl] wouldn’t make statements like that if I played for the Sonics.”
LeBron James admitted that in his first season with the Miami Heat, facing an unprecedented barrage of criticism, that he was listening too much to what people were saying. That desire to prove the critics wrong definitely impacted his play in last year’s finals. This season was a different story. James even said after the finals that this season he made the conscious effort to block out what the detractors were saying and focus just on why he needs to do to help his team win.
Even on Jordan’s worst day, he never experienced the level of sustained blasting that James has.
Sure Jordan had his critics. But once he won the title in 1991, he was given the credit and respect from the media and proclaimed the “best player on the planet” without a single “but” coming afterward. James is in the same position Jordan was in 1991, and is still facing criticism for liking a magazine cover story about him.
Jordan may have been the best player ever, but one wonders how he would have responded to the level of sustained criticism that James still endures, especially considering how he is still angry about comments made by Krause and Van Gundy years ago.
After 10 years of endless criticisms, James has finally learned to block it all out. Jordan brought his grievances with him to his Hall of Fame speech to settle old scores.
I think right now one could argue that Jordan leads James in another statistical category: Sensitivity.
Read more NBA news on BleacherReport.com
What does it say about Dwight Howard that most NBA fans don’t hate him as much as they hate LeBron James?
Is Howard not that popular? Is he not that good? Is he not sitting that close to Jim Gray?
What Howard has done over the course of the last year has been every bit as terrible as LeBron’s Decision with far less vitriol from the basketball populous.
Granted, part of the LeBron hatred was due to leaving his hometown team via free agency and stringing the city of Cleveland (and part of New York) along for weeks before a garish proclamation at the end of a ridiculous hour-long charade where Gray asked innocuous questions about the process and biting his finger nails and any other time-wasting nonsense he could think of before getting to the point of the show.
![]()
The Decision was a public relations nightmare for James, something of a cautionary tale for athletes faced with similar choices in their own celebrated careers. Howard must have been busy that night, or must have figured his situation in Orlando was somehow different from what James went through. Why he thinks his behavior this year should come without disdain is anyone’s guess.
Instead of taking LeBron’s gaffe and using it to his advantage by handling his free agency with professionalism and respect, Howard held the Magic hostage by floating a year in advance that he wanted to go to a team in the New York market.
Then, instead of finishing last year in Orlando and becoming a free agent this offseason, Howard inexplicably waived his one-year early termination, thereby holding the city of Orlando—and the entire NBA—hostage for another year. In March, ESPN Insider Chris Broussard penned a column headlined “Dwight Howard Wants To Stay.”
How long did that last? A month? Two?
Certainly the owners in Orlando have made mistakes since then. Their biggest gaffe may have been trusting Howard to have the best interest of their team in mind at any point in this process. Did anyone really think when Howard stayed the extra year in Orlando that he was going to re-sign long term? Who is the biggest fool in this?
Forget about what actually happened, and let’s stick for a moment with the public perception of what the last few months looked like from the outside.
Howard rumbled that he was unhappy in Orlando, despite being on one of the top four teams in the Eastern Conference.
Rumors started to swirl that Howard wanted to leave Orlando for the Nets, one of the worst teams in the NBA. Rumors started to swirl that Howard would consider staying in Orlando if Stan Van Gundy was fired. Van Gundy addressed those concerns in the terribly awkward interview session that got interrupted by Howard—talk about a video bomb—before Van Gundy was eventually and unsurprisingly fired in May.
Let’s not forget that between the time Howard reportedly wanted Van Gundy fired and the time he actually got the coach fired, the All-Star center got hurt and wasn’t able to play, thereby ruining any chance Orlando had to make a run in the NBA playoffs.
Still, for whatever reason, Howard had all the leverage in town.
With the ability to pick his own head coach (and with a new GM to help stock the team around him), Howard balked, reportedly upset at the Magic front office for not publicly defending him when the allegations came out during the season that he wanted Van Gundy fired.
Let’s recap: Howard reportedly wanted his coach fired, then lied to everyone on the planet after Van Gundy told reporters the story. When his coach was fired, thanks in large part to Howard tearing apart the team and being unable to contribute at all on the court, Howard’s reaction was to demand a trade anyway.
How is this not worse than The Decision?
How do we not hate this man as much as LeBron?
How is Howard allowed to get away with this?
If possible, it gets worse. Not only does Howard want out of Orlando, he has made it clear he only wants to go to the Nets, meaning that any team who tries to trade for him will be renting the All-Star’s services for one season, thereby lessening any value Orlando can get n return unless the Nets were the trade partner.
Tired of being hamstrung by rumors, the Nets went ahead and locked up their other pieces, taking themselves out of the Dwight sweepstakes until at least midseason.
What’s left? The Lakers are willing to part with Andrew Bynum for a year with Howard in hopes they can take that time to convince him to stay forever. Los Angeles is a perfect landing spot for a guy who overvalues his own importance like Howard does. He’d fit right in among the many self-proclaimed stars in that town (and, of course, Kobe Bryant).
The Rockets are also interested in Howard, hoping to revitalize the center position in the post-Yao Ming era in Houston. That, or they figure they can buy low on Howard and sell him to the Nets at the deadline if their season goes south.
Howard is ostensibly holding three franchises hostage right now—more if you still include the Nets, and still more if you count the Cavs, who have been rumored as part of a three-team deal.
Howard doesn’t just want his cake—he wants to eat all but one bite before complaining that he didn’t like the icing and demanding a new piece so he can eat that one too.
Howard wants to play in the city of his choosing for the coach of his choosing with the players of his choosing, and he somehow still expects everyone in the league to like him after this is done. Again, how is this not worse than The Decision?
Perhaps it’s just a matter of timing. LeBron wasn’t hated by Cleveland or New York before The Decision. Even the rigmarole of that made-for-prime-time ESPN event wouldn’t have annoyed nearly as many people had he taken his talents back to Cleveland instead of South Beach.
It could just be a matter of time before the rest of the country catches up to Orlando’s hatred of Howard, because boy do they hate him there. Just think, if Howard does end up with the Nets, Houston and Los Angeles—and most of New York—will hate him too. The rest of the country can’t be too far behind.
Read more NBA news on BleacherReport.com