Jun 202012
 

And now for your daily dose of flopping, courtesy of Dwyane Wade and James Harden.

 

Okay, so maybe this particular play from Game 3 of the NBA Finals isn’t exactly your average flop. There’s no stepping in to take a hit or contact exaggerated by the recipient.

But there is plenty of acting involved, enough to convince the attendant referee to blow his whistle, and (ironically enough) both players in question are notorious floppers, the sort whose unseemly conduct commissioner David Stern frowns upon and now wants to stamp out of the game.

And for good reason. As Stern is so prone to spewing these days, players who “embellish” or fabricate contact are doing little more than tricking the officials rather than making good, sound basketball plays.

Granted, what they’re doing isn’t technically against the rules yet, though they are taking advantage of a loophole of sorts. They know, as do all players, that refs have their hands (and eyes) full when calling a game. It’s up to three people in zebra stripes to keep track of 10 oversized human beings at one time and, among other things, determine on the fly how much contact is too much given the players involved and the activity on the court.

Acting, then, is essentially a way for players like Wade and Harden to exploit how thinly spread each official’s attention is at any moment in time. It’s a way for guys to (attempt to) gain an advantage in a way that’s neither within nor outside of the current rules. Those in question are using a dash of fakery to force officials to make calls that probably wouldn’t exist otherwise.

In that sense, it’s hard to fault serial floppers for doing what they do. They’re trying to win by any means necessary, even if that means rubbing fans, fellow players, coaches, officials and league bigwigs the wrong way.

And it’s not quite as “egregious” a skirting of conventions as, say, the use of performance-enhancing drugs in baseball. Flopping doesn’t show up on the stat sheet and doesn’t translate to bigger paydays for those who employ it as an in-game tactic.

What’s often lost, though, is that flopping isn’t a fail-safe way of improving one team’s chances of success. Some flops prompt charge calls, while others result in blocks and leave the opposition with a free path to the basket and no whistle to stop him. From that standpoint, it’s incumbent upon coaches and teammates to discourage flop artists from trying to paint masterpieces, lest they put their own team’s success at risk.

The bigger issue, though, is what flopping does to the league’s standard of officiating. Namely, it degrades that standard by distracting the refs’ fleeting attention from other plays that might actually warrant a foul call.

Which, when it comes down to it, is why actors like Wade and Harden should be admonished, and why the league itself must take steps to ensure its ability to do just that. The quality of officiating often has a direct impact on the quality of the product that the NBA is pushing. The game’s integrity, already damaged by the Tim Donaghy scandal and the yearly conspiracy theories surrounding the draft lottery, might just be at stake.

Follow @Josh_E_Martin 

Read more NBA news on BleacherReport.com

Go to Source

Jun 012012
 

If you notice anything strange in the stands during tonight’s Celtics/Heat game, don’t be alarmed.

What you’re likely seeing is a group of fans wearing cut-out Tim Donaghy masks. Yes, really. After there being a lot of talk about officiating in the first two games of this series—both Heat victories–Boston sports radio hosts Toucher & Rich of 98.5 The Sports Hub created a print out mask of Tim Donaghy for Boston fans to wear to the game tonight.

From CBS Boston:

Let’s face it, folks: the fix is in. So let David Stern know how you feel on national television tonight by wearing your very own TIM DONAGHY MASK.

Just print it out, cut along the lines, and wear it proudly at tonight’s Celtics game!!!

Donaghy, of course, is the former NBA official caught in the middle of a sports-betting scandal. While that’s one way to allow your opinions to be heard, this is a little too much isn’t it? Whatever happened to booing the officials or chanting “Bullshit” in unison? Do we really need to be wearing masks of disgraced former officials?

Regardless of your thoughts on the officiating in this series, nothing good is going to come out of wearing these masks. Besides looking like a fool on national television, of course. If that’s what you’re going for, go ahead, print out a mask and put it on. Recognize that complaining about the officiating is not going to win the Celtics this series. The more they—or their fans—focus on the foul calls, the more they get away from their own game plan.

Obviously, I’m not a fan of this idea. How about you? Would you don a Donaghy mask?

Read more NBA news on BleacherReport.com

Go to Source

Jun 012012
 

In the wake of their Game 2 overtime loss to the Miami Heat, many Boston Celtics fans grew livid at several bad calls that helped decide the game. In particular, this Rajon Rondo missed lay-up involved a pretty clear foul by Dwyane Wade , but the Heat ended up converting at the other end to take a four-point lead.
Those fans are still upset. So, to show displeasure at Friday night’s Game 3, they’re going to wear masks of Tim Donaghy, the referee who admitted to betting on games and acting as part of an illegal gambling ring. From CBS Boston (via Deadspin ):

Go to Source

May 292012
 

My girlfriend is not a sports fan and whenever I’m on our living room couch watching a game, she always asks the same question, “Why are you screaming at the referees?  You know they can’t hear you.”

I’ll admit that she has a point. Though I am loud, my lungs have not been blessed to the point where my ranting at various games can actually be heard at the arenas. 

Still, though we may be a few years removed from the Tim Donaghy scandal, NBA officiating still needs a lot of work and monitoring. Some games today are just so poorly called, it makes one question why some referees are even allowed to call games.

That being said, let me take you back to Game 1 of the first-round series between the New York Knicks and Miami Heat. Though Miami was favored, the Knicks had played well enough under coach Mike Woodson and I was expecting the series to be close from start to finish.

Instead, the referees took over and didn’t even let the Knicks play. The final score of that contest was 100-67, with New York scoring a combined 29 points in the second and third quarters.  I’m not saying you all have to agree with me, but I think it’s pretty obvious that the referees let some flops slide in that contest.

Adding onto the case against that game’s referees was a Tweet by ESPN’s Bill Simmons, and he made his opinion crystal clear. I’m sorry, but if one of the best sportswriters in America has an issue with the officiating, particularly in a game featuring teams he doesn’t root for, then there’s a problem.

More importantly, how are the referees in NBA games missing all of the flops that go on?  I recently wrote a column regarding flopping and even NBA Commissioner David Stern thinks that something needs to be done about it.  Last I checked, these officials are paid because of their flawless knowledge of the rules of basketball, but they can’t even tell when a player exaggerates a foul?

The even sadder part is that they’re protected from all criticism. Say one bad thing about the refs after a game, and you get fined by the league.

Anyway, I’m rambling.  The fact of the matter is that yes, NBA officiating is as bad as complaining fans think it is. New York-Miami is one of the greatest rivalries in NBA history, and one that should be a complete and utter dogfight whenever it goes down. Instead, LeBron & Company were practically handed the series (or at least the first game) on a silver platter, and Bill Simmons would agree with me.

If Stern is as serious about flopping as he claims to be, then he’ll start making the refs take responsibility for their bad/blown calls.

Read more NBA news on BleacherReport.com

Go to Source

Mar 262012
 

Okay, I’ve damn well had it. The tanking has got to stop, or at least be addressed. Unweight the NBA lottery already and give all non-playoff teams an equal shot. 

Team owners: Why let this moral hazard compromise the integrity of your league? 

This was an awful weekend of basketball if you had an eye keyed on Golden State. Is that redundant? Anyways, Warriors-Kings on Saturday and Warriors-Blazers on Sunday were two poorly played games where rational fans were probably mostly rooting for their respective teams to lose. I would not be surprised if the teams were comporting themselves in a similar fashion. 

Steve Berman describes Warriors-Kings: 

“Before the Warriors finally ‘won,’ there was some definite tomfoolery going on. Both teams kept turning the ball over in an attempt to tank, but the Kings were just a little better. So even though David Lee had a 5-second violation (which probably gave Smart a feeling of pride since they can’t run inbounds plays without him anymore), the Kings committed 6 turnovers in the final 3:30 to the Warriors’ 2. Sacramento just wanted it more.”

We will never know if both teams were attempting self-sabotage, but this is a system that lavishly rewards failure, and it certainly appeared as such. Even if these squads were trying their spleens out, there is a credibility issue.

We’re in the midst of a statistics revolution, and the rise of a new, coldly rational NBA owner class. It is impossible to measure, but this theoretically should be a golden era of intentional failure. So it must not be surprising that multiple teams are playing notional basketball, at least in terms of strategy. 

Rich Cho, a smart man by all accounts, built a horrid Bobcats roster, probably with the express intent of tanking for picks. 

David Stern himself vetoed a trade toward playoff contention, possibly to ensure that New Orleans would hit lotto gold

Portland gutted their roster at the deadline in an obvious tank, er, “rebuilding” effort. 

The Warriors did about the same, and they have even more incentive to lose on account of getting a first round pick only if it’s top-seven.  

A connected, compounding problem is that if this is a golden era of tanking, this is an increasingly bad advertisement for the sport. If there is literal or figurative foul play, then it cannot simply slough off into the night, unnoticed like so many obscure 1992 Mavericks games.

The league is more-widely watched than ever before, and many League Pass customers must wonder why they’re paying hard money to see half the NBA’s teams simply not try. 

So why continue on with this league-legislated Tim Donaghy situation? I believe that the simple, elegant solution is to make it a true lottery, the aforementioned system where all non-playoff squads get an equal shot. The best lotto team is usually far from great, and could use the help. Also, no sane GM would miss the playoffs for a 1/14 chance at a superstar.

In the beginning, the lottery was designed to prevent dive-taking. Weighting the sucker simply erased that goal. So let us return every playoff-misser to the purity of chance, and free them to compete hard for their fans.

End the embarrassment. Unweight the lottery. 

Read more NBA news on BleacherReport.com

Go to Source