Dec 062012
 

With 4 1/2 minutes to play in Wednesday night’s matchup between the Indiana Pacers and Portland Trail Blazers — a game the Pacers had led by 18 points just seven minutes earlier, but that Portland had tightened up thanks to a 21-9 run — Pacers center Roy Hibbert fouled Blazers point guard while trying to hedge on a high screen-and-roll. When Lillard stepped to the line, cameras showed that he had suffered a pretty big cut on his right elbow, possibly when Hibbert poked at the ball with his left hand:

The Guidelines for Infection Control in the Official Rules of the National Basketball Association read, in part, as follows:
If a player suffers a laceration or a wound where bleeding occurs or if blood is visible on a player or his uniform, the officials shall suspend the game at the earliest appropriate time and allow a maximum of 30 seconds for treatment. After that time, the head coach shall be informed that he has the option to substitute for the player, call a regular timeout or a 20-second timeout.
The officials didn’t seem to notice, since play wasn’t stopped for Lillard to receive treatment on the cut until nearly three minutes later. Part of the reason why they didn’t notice sooner, though, can be credited to Hibbert, as captured by eagle-eyed YouTube user somekido17 :

Shrewd move pulling those massive shorts up high enough to cover up that blood stain, Roy. Not the most hygienic or fashion-forward, necessarily, but still: Smart. Plus, the quick look around you, the little “hope nobody saw that” face … priceless.

Go to Source

Dec 052012
 

It was a disappointing loss for the Chicago Bulls Tuesday night as they hosted the Indiana Pacers in a heated rivalry game. Paul George led the way for Indiana with 34 points. Roy Hibbert (10 points, 11 rebounds) chipped in with a double-double.

Nate Robinson was the Bulls’ leading scorer with 19 points (5-for-13 shooting) off the bench. Robinson lead the Bulls on a fourth-quarter comeback with 11 points. He also ended up hurting them by taking rushed and contested shots towards the end, turning the ball over three times in the quarter.

With under 30 seconds left in the final period and the Bulls down by two, Joakim Noah found an open Luol Deng on a backdoor cut. Roy Hibbert went up to contest the shot and Deng drew a lot of contact. A questionable no-call by the officials left the Pacers with control of the ball; a possession that would clinch the game.

 

Game Positives

Chicago’s defense played extremely well, allowing just 80 points on 36-percent shooting. The Bulls drew many offensive fouls, especially in the first half, and forced Indiana to commit 12 turnovers. The Bulls were strong once again on the boards, grabbing 46 total rebounds (13 offensive). Carlos Boozer posted his seventh double-double of the season with 14 points and 10 boards.

 

Game Criticisms

The Bulls’ offensive struggles continued. They shot 38 percent from the floor and turned the ball over 19 times. A poor showing by the bench—with the exception of Nate Robinson—as the bench managed only six points. However, they were a man short this game with Marco Belinelli filling in for an injured Richard Hamilton.

This was the Bulls’ first game in a stretch of four games in five nights. They travel to Cleveland on Wednesday for another divisional matchup.

The Bulls drop to 8-8 after the loss to Indiana.

Read more Chicago Bulls news on BleacherReport.com

Go to Source

Nov 152012
 

With the Chicago Bulls undergoing an unfortunate waiting period with star guard Derrick Rose on the shelf, and the Boston Celtics seemingly rebuilding on the fly after watching Ray Allen take his senior act down to South Beach, the Indiana Pacers were everyone’s pick take the East’s mantle as The Second Greatest Thang Besides the Heat. After all, the Pacers gave Miami a good show in last May’s second round loss to the Heat, and internal development combined with a full year of workhorse coach Frank Vogel’s machinations seemed to line all the breadcrumbs toward a second seed season.
Just nine games in, the Pacers might still be well on their way to that spot come spring, but the start to the 2012-13 season has been an absolute miss. The squad has lost six out of nine games to begin the campaign, and even with 73 to play that record hardly seems to resemble how awful the team has looked. Yes, it is holding its own defensively, and we’re all mindful of the fact that scoring swingman Danny Granger will be out for a while due to some worrying knee issues, but the Pacers reek.
And with Granger away from the media’s glare, and Paul George too green to take on all the slings and arrows, max contract-outfitted Roy Hibbert is left to answer for his team’s slow start. True to form, and somewhat making up for the dodgy start, the All-Star big man is holding his own in terms of explanation. From NBA.com’s Steve Aschburner :
” […] 23 minutes he spent on the Pacers’ bench, compared to his 25 in the game, were just as bad. Hibbert rolled his eyes at calls and non-calls, slammed his towel to the floor when Bucks’ shooters got friendly bounces and covered his face time and again. At one point, his 7-foot-2 self was folded into the open chair next to him, face down, anguishing through a butt-kicking that got to 32 points at one juncture against Milwaukee.
Then, the Pacers center beat himself up pretty bad in the visitors’ dressing room, too.

Go to Source

Nov 102012
 

The hype around Philadelphia’s newly acquired center Andrew Bynum is getting a little too trite, but the longer wait yields even higher anticipation. The fans cannot wait to see how he will stack up against the rest of the Eastern Conference.

The big question that comes along with this is, “How will Bynum fare against the rest of the centers?” Lucky for you, there are reasonable explanations for this broad question.

In order to truly examine how well he can play and to assess this question, it is vital to establish the top tier set of centers that will compete with him. I narrowed them to this list: Roy Hibbert, Kevin Garnett, Tyson Chandler, Brook Lopez, Andrea Bargnani, Greg Monroe, and Nene.

All of these guys are definitely their own players, but I grouped some of them together because the pros and cons were very similar in certain cases.

Begin Slideshow

Go to Source

Oct 102012
 

It may sound silly on the surface, but sometimes, a team’s depth can actually hurt it. If a head coach cannot devise a set rotation come playoff time, the ballclub as a whole can actually suffer from a lack of consistency. Having one of the deepest teams in the league coming into this season, Boston Celtics coach Doc Rivers will be faced with this challenge.

Of course, having “too much” depth is a pretty cushy problem to have. Other teams in the league are merely worried about fielding a competent starting lineup, never mind a 10-man rotation. It’s kind of like having six capable starting pitchers in baseball. The manager will deal with the conundrum of deciding which pitcher to leave out of the rotation while plenty of other squads are scrambling to just find two or three reliable starters.

That being said, basketball is a bit of a different animal. In baseball, you don’t have to worry about your five starting pitchers forging a chemistry between one another. It is more of an individual thing. In this sport, however, players feed off of one another and, generally, work much better with familiar faces.

The Celtics will enter this season with 12 or 13 players that can realistically be a part of any team’s rotation. Take Jason Collins for example. He may be one of the worst players on the club, but he played a significant role for the Atlanta Hawks during the playoffs this past year. He was also the starting center for the New Jersey (now Brooklyn) Nets during their run to the finals in 2003. Collins has proven he can be a rotational player for other ballclubs, so why can’t he be one for Boston, as well?

Collins is only one of seemingly countless players on the C’s who has a chance to wriggle his way into Rivers’ rotation. That means that Doc is going to have the opportunity to experiment with myriads of different lineups. First, we’ll break down the different types of lineups we may see according to particular situations. Then, we will predict the rotation we will most likely see come playoff time. Let’s check out those scads of lineups first.

 

Starting lineup

C – Kevin Garnett

PF – Brandon Bass

SF – Paul Pierce

SG – Courtney Lee/Avery Bradley

PG – Rajon Rondo

Breakdown: This is the lineup that we will see on the floor to start every game. When Bradley gets healthy, he will likely be the shooting guard, but while he recovers from his shoulder surgeries, Lee will get the nod. Sans Lee, this is the lineup we saw during the second half of last season and in the playoffs (up until Bradley went down), and it was certainly effective.

Garnett looked revitalized at center, and Bass did an admirable job as the team’s starting power forward. As for Avery, he developed into one of the game’s best perimeter defenders while starting at the 2.

 

Uptempo (with Garnett)

C – Garnett

PF – Chris Wilcox

SF – Jeff Green/Lee

SG – Jason Terry/Bradley/Lee

PG – Rondo

Breakdown: See, it’s situations like this where the depth comes in handy. Rivers can go in quite a few different directions at the wing spots here. He can go with either Green or Lee at the 3 and then he can pick one of Terry, Bradley or Lee to man the shooting guard spot.

Personally, I’d go with a lineup of K.G., Wilcox, Green, JET and Rondo because it not only gives the Celtics a great transition game, but it gives them some size as well. At 6’9″, Green is a big small forward, and Garnett and Wilcox present Doc with bigs who can run the floor up front. Terry does kind of break the “size” pattern, but he is such an outstanding player on the break that I had to include him in the lineup. Not only can he get to the basket, but he can also spot up on the wing for the three.

 

Uptempo (without Garnett)

C – Wilcox

PF – Green

SF – Lee

SG – Terry/Bradley

PG – Rondo

Breakdown: You’re sacrificing some size here, but this lineup would obviously only be appropriate if K.G. needs a breather. Green then slides up to the 4 and Lee moves to small forward.

 

Low post offense

C – Garnett

PF – Jared Sullinger

SF – Pierce

SG – Terry/Lee/Bradley

PG – Rondo

Breakdown: Based on what we’ve seen out of Sullinger thus far in the preseason, the Celtics may end up with one of the deadliest frontcourt duos in the league with Garnett and the rookie. Sullinger has “Zach Randolph” written all over him. He is truly that skilled in the post, and that will take a ton of pressure off of K.G.’s shoulders.

Last season, Garnett was the only player Boston could go to when it needed an easy bucket inside. Now with Sully in tow, Doc has another guy he can run plays for down low. Look for a lot of backdoor cuts from the likes of Rondo, Terry, Lee and Bradley while the ball is in the hands of either K.G. or Sullinger in the post. Also, look for whomever is playing the 2-guard to spot up behind the three-point line if and when double-teams start coming.

I love the potential of this lineup. It really opens up everything offensively.

 

Defense, defense, defense

C – Collins/Darko Milicic

PF – Garnett

SF – Pierce

SG – Bradley

PG – Rondo

Breakdown: More than likely, this will be the Celtics’ best defensive lineup, and you will most likely see it employed against teams with good offensive centers (i.e. the division rival Philadelphia 76ers and Andrew Bynum). The whole reason Boston brought Collins in was to help Garnett defend up front. At the age of 36, you don’t want K.G. banging with the likes of Bynum, Dwight Howard, Roy Hibbert, etc. all game. You will likely see Milicic get some time at the 5 here, too.

The pair of Bradley and Rondo represents arguably the best defensive backcourt in the league, and Pierce is a fine defender at the 3.

 

Crunchtime

C – Garnett

PF – Bass

SF – Pierce

SG – Terry

PG – Rondo

Breakdown: This is the Celtics’ best lineup offensively, and that’s why you will see it quite often at the end of games. Now obviously, the lineup may differ depending on the situation. If Boston is up by a couple of buckets, you might see Bradley on the floor instead of Terry. However, in that scenario, the C’s could then just swap the 2 during stoppages of play.

Regardless, this is one of the main reasons the Celtics signed Terry: To step up in the fourth quarter. He has proven to be one of the game’s best clutch shooters, so there is every reason to believe that Doc will give him the nod under these circumstances.

 

Blowouts

C – Fab Melo

PF – Sullinger

SF – Kris Joseph

SG – Bradley

PG – Dionte Christmas

Breakdown: Hey, might as well give the kids a chance to play, right? Of course, neither Joseph nor Christmas have been guaranteed roster spots, but barring a last-minute signing or trade, both will likely be on Boston’s bench come opening night.

Clearly, there will be different variations of these lineups throughout the season. Rivers is not always going to go with these exact five players for those specific situations, but there is a very good chance that those are the types of lineups that you will see.

 

So, now that I’ve given you a taste of all of the various combinations we may witness, let’s take a look at what the rotation may look like come playoff time. I also estimated the amount of minutes they will be playing in parentheses.

 

Playoff rotation

C – Garnett (35) / Wilcox (8) / Collins or Milicic (5)

PF – Bass (25) / Sullinger (15) / Green (6) / Wilcox (2)

SF – Pierce (33) / Green (10) / Lee (5)

SG – Bradley (20) / Terry (15) / Lee (13)

PG – Rondo (38) / Terry (10)

Total minutes for each player: Rondo (38), Garnett (35), Pierce (33), Bass (25), Terry (25), Bradley (20), Lee (18), Green (16), Sullinger (15), Wilcox (10), Collins/Milicic (5)

These are all very rough estimates, but, at the same time, fairly realistic. The toughest decision for Rivers to make will clearly be at 2-guard. How will he allocate playing time between those three guys?

Being that Lee can play the 3 and Terry is basically the backup point guard, it makes things slightly easier, as Doc can then mix and match while still getting everyone relatively equal burn. That said, what lineups we see will certainly depend on the opponent. For example, you will probably see Bradley get more than 20 minutes against a team like the Miami Heat where he would be assigned to Dwyane Wade defensively.

In the frontcourt, Sullinger can play some center, but Rivers will likely give those extra minutes to either Collins or Milicic. Again, though, it depends on who the Celtics are playing. If the matchup is against Bynum and the 76ers, you may see someone like Collins get anywhere from 10-20 minutes. Same goes for Milicic.

Finally, regular season performance obviously holds a significant amount of weight here. If Sullinger bombs during the season, you might not see him get any minutes at all. However, if he impresses, you might even see him in the starting lineup with Bass coming off the pine. Then, if Milicic revitalizes his career, you will certainly see him get more than five minutes a night.

Not only that, but single-game performance will also affect the allotted minutes for each player. If Lee is outplaying Bradley and Terry one night, he will see the bulk of the minutes at the 2 for that game. If Green is giving the opponent matchup nightmares, Doc will find a way to get him more than 16 minutes.

All of that said, it is fun to speculate and imagine what the rotation is going to look like come playoff time.

To wrap this all up, Boston’s depth will help it in its quest for an 18th NBA title this season. It’s not that the C’s have only quantity; they have quality, and they have enough versatility where there will not be any logjams at any specific position. Sure, they may have three natural shooting guards, but two of them can play other areas of the floor.

You would be hard-pressed to find another team in the league with the kind of overall talent that the Celtics have up and down the roster.

Read more Boston Celtics news on BleacherReport.com

Go to Source

Sep 122012
 

A look around the league and the web that covers it. It’s also important to note that the rotation order and starting nods aren’t always listed in order of importance. That’s for you, dear reader, to figure out.
C : NBA.com . The Twitter convos between Pacers center Roy Hibbert and Top Two comedian Chelsea Peretti have long brought the best in both these besties, and now you can listen to the two chat it up on Sekou Smith’s Hang Time podcast.
PF : Pro Basketball Talk . Rajon Rondo, unsurprisingly, is cool to the idea of “Ray Allen.”
SF : Hardwood Paroxysm . Curtis Harris details the best and brightest of the 1954-55 (!) season.
SG : NBA.com . John Schuhmann talks efficiency dives from last year’s crummy lockout season.
PG : A Wolf Among Wolves . Robbie Hummel just cannot catch a break.

Go to Source