Jun 262012
 

NBA draft prospect Harrison Barnes is among the smartest in terms of basketball IQ. However, Barnes, isn’t alone in this category. There are several other intelligent options available in the upper half of the first round of Thursday’s NBA draft.

Basketball IQ is crucial for rookies trying to succeed at the next level of the NBA. It’s something that’s hard to teach. Something players develop as a natural “feel” for the game.

When examining the best prospects in the draft, it’s foolish to ignore this added dynamic that solidifies a prospect’s game. It is, for the most part, an awareness that allows the player to make the right decisions at the right time.

Understanding the game also helps a player act as a coach on the court. This is more crucial in point guards and others who handle the ball frequently, but it is vital for every player.

A random coach asks a player during a timeout, “What are you seeing out there?” The ability to feel the game and diagnose what is happening helps the team and coaching staff make adjustments.

With that said, who are the best of the best when it comes to the 2012 NBA draft class?

 

Bradley Beal, SG, Florida

Besides his obvious talents like his excellent perimeter game, Beal is also one of the most aware prospects on the court. His knowledge and feel for the game allow him to handle the ball and even run the offense from the point. This is vital in the NBA due to injuries and foul trouble late in games.

His intelligence on the floor makes him a dangerous weapon because he can beat you with his physical game as well as his knowledge.

 

Tyler Zeller, C, UNC

Zeller may not be a dominant big man down low, and his perimeter game is only serviceable. However, his soft touch around the rim and high basketball IQ make him a very desirable addition to any NBA squad.

Zeller’s feel for the game makes him a dynamic big man who can run the floor and make plays in transition. He’s a matchup problem for some of the larger, slower big men in the league.

 

Damian Lillard, PG, Weber State

Lillard is a hardworking point guard who plays as efficiently as you can from the point guard position. His ability to navigate offenses will make him a very appealing choice for teams looking to add a floor general to better their squad. His smarts help him to penetrate defenses to create for teammates and for himself off the dribble.

 

Jared Sullinger, PF, Ohio St.

Sullinger has come under some scrutiny about his work ethic and size. His 6’9” frame is small in comparison to the NBA talent at center, his preferred position.

However, his basketball IQ—specifically in the post—and his long wingspan may make up for his physical limitations. Sullinger knows how to operate and free himself up down low—an essential facet of any low-post player’s game at the NBA level.

 

Harrison Barnes, SF, UNC

Barnes is perhaps one of the best scorers of the bunch in the 2012 NBA draft class. His fundamentals are among some of the best out there. However, he has been tabbed as one-dimensional by several scouting agencies out there.

This, fortunately for Barnes, simply isn’t true.

His presence on the court is amplified by his grasp of the game. He may not be polished and ready to be the NBA MVP in his rookie season, but he’s smart and gifted enough to eventually get there.

 

 

 

Follow Mike on Twitter @BigHoagowski

Read more NBA news on BleacherReport.com

Go to Source

May 092012
 

Jared Sullinger, like so many draft prospects, is a human/object lesson in “don’t stay in school.” He waited a year, and now he is plummeting down the lotto rankings. Chard Ford’s ESPN board has the skilled Ohio St. power forward ranked No. 9, and Jonathan Givony (who actually praises Sullinger‘s potential quite frequently) has the kid slated at No. 14 on his Draft Express board

What gives?

It would appear that Sully is losing out to the gleam of potential. As we get closer to actual draft day, GMs are becoming increasingly enamored with flashy, unpredictable prospects. Small-schooler Damian Lillard has rocketed up boards after signing with power agent Aaron Goodwin. Arnett Moultrie of Mississippi St. has also made a leap. 

Better-known prospects like Austin Rivers and Kendall Marshall have also made their pushes. Rivers did not live up to his hype at Duke, but he still retains enough hype to perhaps vault into the lottery. Marshall is confounding as a “pass-only” guard, but optimistic GMs are pegging him at “Rajon Rondo” instead of “Marcus Williams.” 

As GMs go for the home run in the draft gold rush (mixing my metaphors there), slow and steady loses out. I personally think Sullinger should go much higher than No. 14 or No. 9, based on college stats that resemble Kevin Love’s. But it’s hard for a marginally athletic, undersized big to get much love in the “strike it rich” atmosphere that pervades draft discussion.

Read more NBA news on BleacherReport.com

Go to Source

Apr 042012
 

Jared Sullinger declared for the draft today, and his stock may rise if people mistake the Ohio St. star for Kevin Love. After all, both put up roughly 17 points and 10 boards in college, and both trend towards undersized and chubby. Some would look at Sullinger and think another future NBA superstar lies within the trudging pudge (though yes, he’s gotten slimmer).

Not so fast. While their stats are similar…

(Re-watches various recorded clips of both, struggles with difficult conclusion)

Okay, well I have to admit that UCLA Kevin Love is incredibly similar to Ohio State Jared Sullinger. I find the conclusion discomfiting as I did not expect much from Sullinger‘s NBA career. Last year, he recorded less than one block per game, which is almost always a death knell for frontcourt NBA prospects. But sophomore Sully is more athletic and disruptive, tallying 1.1 blocks and 1.2 steals per contest. 

But the tape does not lie. The Kevin Love of UCLA yore was not the bearded three-point assassin of an MVP candidate that we see today. He plodded around the rim, relying on guile much in the way Jared Sullinger outwits taller, faster opponents. 

There are a few differences between how these two performed as college stars. Love’s game was more refined around the rim, he could use a vast array of hook shots to score from that range. Sullinger has a more basic approach. He seals off the defender by jutting his massive butt backwards, and simply whips around for the layup. If draped by defenders, JS simply pump-fakes until the smoke clears. This does not always work, Sullinger gets his shot redirected with frequency. 

No, they aren’t completely the same, and Sullinger‘s similarities to Love do not guarantee that Sullinger will have Love’s career. But Kevin Love’s success should add quite a bit to Jared Sullinger‘s bank account this summer, and that isn’t an entirely unreasonable occurrence. 

Read more NBA news on BleacherReport.com

Go to Source