Jul 042012
 

Few things in basketball can change a franchise’s destiny like a No. 1 overall draft pick, but that’s not always a good thing. For every Tim Duncan who can carry the team for more than a decade, there’s a Michael Olowokandi who can’t even stay in the league for a decade.

The latest hot prospect to get his chance to sink or swim as a pro is Kentucky’s Anthony Davis, chosen No. 1 by the Hornets last week. It’s much too early to tell what Davis’ NBA future looks like, but after his magnificent season in Lexington, the Hornets have good reason to hope that he’ll turn out to be the right man to have spent their top pick on.

Read on for a look at Davis and the rest of the last 10 No. 1 overall selections, with an eye both to their NBA performance and to how badly their teams might have wished for a do-over with the advantages of draft-class hindsight.

Begin Slideshow

Go to Source

Jun 252012
 

The future is now, and the stakes are high.

The 2012 NBA draft is every franchise’s opportunity to grab the league’s next superstar, but history has proven that only a select few prospects ever reach their full potential.

Sure, Anthony Davis could be the next Hakeem Olajuwon. But he could also go down in history as the next great bust of the hoops world, alongside the Kwame Browns and Michael Olowokandi.

In the NBA, nothing is granted—everything is earned. 

In this Bleacher Report Productions series, we compare each 2012 NBA draft prospect to their best-case and worst-case pro counterparts, also offering predictions on how each incoming pro will pan out. 

Be sure to sound off and let us know what you think in the comments below. If you like what you see, click here for more from Bleacher Report Productions. 

Read more NBA news on BleacherReport.com

Go to Source

Jun 072012
 

Have you ever heard the phrase “Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it?” History will repeat itself on June 28, when some team near the top of the NBA Draft will select UConn big man Andre Drummond. That team will face the same doomed result that the Memphis Grizzlies suffered just three years ago, when they drafted fellow UConn big Hasheem Thabeet.

In 2009, the Grizzlies took Thabeet with their second overall pick. The big man was known for his defense at UConn, but came with some fairly high question marks about both his offense and his competitiveness. Still, with such a gifted body giving him excellent potential, the Grizzlies felt they had no choice but to take him.

Fast forward to 2012. The 7’4” center has never averaged more than 13 minutes a game in his three years in the league.  The Grizzlies didn’t even wait a year—they traded Thabeet to the Houston Rockets after his first season, and a year later, the Rockets traded him to the Portland Trailblazers.

Three teams, three seasons. Safe to say, Thabeet was a huge ThaBUST.

And now in the 2012 Draft comes along another UConn big man, the 6’11” Drummond. Much like Thabeet, he’s athletically gifted and extremely raw, and comes with red-flags about his work ethic.

Where Thabeet was gifted with extreme height and slightly above-average athleticism, Drummond is just 6’11”, but has Dwight Howard‘s extreme athleticism and strength. That is where their differences end.

Drummond, like Thabeet, is known for his defense. Thabeet averaged 4.2 blocks a game his junior season, where Drummond averaged 2.7 last season.  Offensively, Drummond may be even rawer than Thabeet was. Thabeet did have an extra two years of college when he entered the draft, so it’s hard to really judge Drummond based on Thabeet’s freshmen stats, but both players are/were exceedingly sketchy offensively. 

More importantly, Thabeet didn’t have the mental focus for the NBA game. Scouts saw his body and defensive abilities and seemed to assume he would mold into the league. He didn’t have the work ethic or the competitive spirit that he needed, and without that, Thabeet will be lucky if he’s in the league in two more years.

Drummond showed those same red flags last season at UConn. For a guy who could physically dominate his opponents night in and night out, his production was very disappointing. He averaged 10.2 points and 7.7 rebounds, but never seemed completely motivated. At times, he looked lost on the court—at others, he looked down right lazy.

Big men will always be the most difficult and alluring to draft. The history of the NBA Draft does have a history of athletically-gifted talent-raw bigs that worked out (Dwight Howard, Amare Stoudemire) but it’s also riddled with the failed careers of those who didn’t work out—like Kwame Brown, Michael Olowokandi, and most recently, Thabeet.

Drafting an athletic and raw big is one of the more risky moves to pull in an NBA Draft, yet at the same time, passing on that big is seen as just as risky. While no GM wants to be the guy who drafts a bust, they also don’t want to be the ones who pass on a future superstar.

With all due respect to point guards, the big man is the most important position in the league, and many teams feel that if they just draft that if they can add that superstar big, they will be a team that can compete every year for a title.

So there will always be teams who reach for those bigs, even as significant question marks remain about the players skills and, more importantly, their mental ability to handle the NBA. Hasheem Thabeet had the physical tools to be an excellent player, but he never had the necessary focus or determination to make it in the big league.

Does Drummond have the work ethic? It sure didn’t look like it at UConn. Unless he suddenly decides to put all of his effort into his sport, Drummond will be nothing more than just another of the long line of big men busts. 

Read more NBA news on BleacherReport.com

Go to Source

Jun 052012
 

Look at any NBA draft and notice there’s always a few players drafted in the top 10 who just don’t pan out. It’s happened with picks going as high as No. 1—Michael Olowokandi—and with No. 2 picks like Darko Milicic and even Michael Sweetney at the No. 9 pick from that same ’03 draft.

This year’s draft will be no different. So here are four players projected to go in the top 10 who may be in for a rude awakening.

Begin Slideshow

Go to Source

Jun 052012
 

Andre Drummond and Perry Jones. Two names that not only seem to be synonymous with the boom or bust phrase but the two players in this year’s draft that seem almost destined to be busts. As Lee Corso (yes, I know I have the wrong sport) would say, “not so fast my friend”!

Long before Andre the Giant and PJ III were household names amongst basketball fans, the NBA draft was filled with players who seemed destined to be busts, and well, turned out to be just that. Players such as Chris Washburn in 1986, Shawn Bradley in 1993, Michael Olowokandi in 1998, Kwame Brown in 2001, Darko Milicic in 2003, Adam Morrison in 2006 and well, just about everyone in the 2000 draft!

However, it seems that for every prospect seemingly destined to become a bust and who turned out to be such, there is also a player that was just as destined for failure yet ascended to greatness, or at least, you know, non-bust-ness.

Allow me to introduce you to five such players now.

Begin Slideshow

Go to Source

Feb 092012
 

The Minnesota Timberwolves have had trouble finding a “center of the future” during their existence. The Wolves have tried everyone from Paul Grant to Michael Olowokandi to Reggie Slater. In other words, it’s been a mess.

So it might be a bit mind-boggling if I say the Wolves have found their man in Nikola Pekovic. Yes, Nikola Pekovic.

The Wolves have seen this before. A random center from overseas has mostly mediocre performances, but every once in a while, he’ll have a game where he throws up Kevin Love numbers. OK, maybe that’s an exaggeration for Rasho Nesterovic, but when he had a 20-point game, eyebrows were raised.

They’re being raised now by the play of Pekovic, the Timberwolves second-round pick in the 2008 NBA draft. Coming into this season, many expected Pekovic to be a bench player who would come in during garbage time.

However, his recent play combined with the ineffectiveness of Darko Milicic has opened the door for Pekovic to show the strides his made from his rookie season to this season.

Looking back on last year, there were times where I was impressed with Pekovic’s skill set in the post. While attending a Timberwolves game, I saw that Pekovic had 14 points and was actually impressed with his ability to score. As soon as those words came out, somebody would blow by him in the paint.

However, while he’s not a great defensive player, he’s done enough to be more than just an orange cone when somebody is driving into the paint.

He’s been able to pull down rebounds, alter shots and shown why Fran Fraschilla called him the “obvious first pick of the second round” when DeAndre Jordan was available.

If Pekovic is able to keep up his recent run of solid play that he’s been on (13.8 points and 9.0 rebounds per game as a starter this season), it could mean that the Wolves have finally found a guy that makes opposing teams focus on their power forward (Kevin Garnett, Al Jefferson, Kevin Love).

The only obstacle left seems to be Rick Adelman’s preference to play Milicic in the starting lineup over Pekovic. However, it only seems like a matter of time until Pekovic gets his chance to display his skills full-time.

Read more NBA news on BleacherReport.com

Go to Source

Dec 282011
 

Now that the dust has settled on Lob City, it’s time to take a step back and examine this year’s Clippers a little closer.

Gone are the two preseason games against the Lakers and the “official” season opener against the much-improved Warriors. Gone is the hype around the addition of Chris Paul, Caron Butler and Chauncey Billups. The honeymoon is over for the Clippers. Now it’s time to see if they can make the difficult transition from potential to productive.

There is no better place to start for this year’s Clippers than in San Antonio.

San Antonio may literally translate to Saint Antonio, but to the Clippers it just means LOSS. Their last victory in the Alamo City came while Blake Griffin was a pre-teen.

In 2002, 12-year-old Griffin might have been shocked to hear that the then 23-23 Clippers beat the 29-14 Spurs in San Antonio. After all, even though the Clippers were playing respectable basketball and had a young team full of potential led by Elton Brand, Quentin Richardson, Lamar Odom and others, Los Angeles basketball was dominated then by the Lakers.

So much has changed in 10 years.

The Clippers beat the Spurs on 1/31/2002 behind 20 points from Michael Olowokandi, 19 from Brand and 18 from Richardson. It was a watershed moment for a young team that was poised to grow and challenge for the Western Conference title a short four years later.

That’s normally how growth occurs in the Association. You develop a team of individuals, take your lumps over years which results in bonding those individuals into a team. Look at the OKC Thunder. They drafted Kevin Durant in 2007 and went 15-67. In 2008, they added Russell Westbrook and improved to 21-61. 2009 was a breakthrough season that saw the 50-win Thunder make the playoffs, losing in the first round. 2010 brought five more wins and a deeper run in the playoffs. This year, they are strong favorites to win the whole thing.

Four years is the normal NBA gestation period from stinker to stunner.

The Clippers are hoping to break that mold. They deviated from the normal growth pattern by bringing in veteran All-Stars, adopting a catchy nickname and generally conducting themselves with a swagger never seen in Clipper-ville.

The first true test for this group of individuals as they try to develop into a team in this shortened NBA season comes tonight at tip-off. Will the Spurs dominate again, bringing back memories of the when the team was better known as Sob-City or will this Clippers team take another significant step towards respectability?

Sure, it’s technically the second game of the season, but for this team it’s much more. It’s the first real test for a team that has championship aspirations.  

Read more NBA news on BleacherReport.com

Go to Source