Sep 052012
 

Over the last decade, NBA fans have seen their teams become huge messes because they overpaid too much for players. The New York Knicks had that problem a few years back when they were handing out big contracts to guys like Jerome James.

In a league with a salary cap, it’s important to get the best value you can out of a player, as overpaying too many players can ruin your chances of winning a title.

Fortunately for Boston Celtic fans, the majority of their players are underpaid which is why they have a chance of winning the East this season. 

Begin Slideshow

Go to Source

Jul 052012
 

According to Adrian Wojnarowski (Yahoo), the Rockets have offered Jeremy Lin a three year deal for $19.5 million with a team option for the fourth year.

To put it in perspective for Knicks fans, Jerome James was paid more in his first two years and his contract went for five years. The Knicks only need to look at their new neighbors giving Gerald Wallace $40 million/4 years to realize that Lin is a relative bargain. The Knicks should not hesitate to match.

Matching the Rockets offer makes sense both financially and on the court. With Steve Nash, Jason Kidd, Kyle Lowry, Goran Dragic, and Deron Williams all off the market, the list of available point guards does not look very promising. The Knicks must ensure that they have a quality point guard leading their offense or they will look much like they did at the beginning of the 2011-2012 season.

Also, Lin coming back to the Knicks validates the signing of Jason Kidd as Kidd will serve to facilitate Lin’s development as a point guard. Before the Rockets agreed to trade Lowry to the Toronto Raptors (ESPN), the Knicks could have landed him in a sign-and-trade for Lin. Now, the Rockets have left the Knicks no choice but to match.

While matching this offer does put the Knicks deep into the luxury tax going forward, does it matter? The Knicks (along with the Lakers) should be teams that laugh in the face of a more punitive luxury tax. I am not advocating reckless spending. I am advocating offering contracts solely for basketball reasons without regard to profits.

However, in the case of Lin, the Knicks do not need to worry about profits. Linsanity showed the power of Jeremy Lin’s brand. No only did Asian Americans become interested in the NBA, Lin became the most popular current NBA player in China. The ability to tap into and dominate a market that large should bring the Knicks all sorts of revenue streams.

The Knicks only need to make sure Lin remains a good player. The better Lin becomes, the bigger his marketability will become. His development should continue under the tutelage of Kidd and his growth as a player will lead to the Knicks winning on and off the court.

The Knicks do not want to end this game of point guard musical chairs without a seat. They should leave that to the Rockets who not only will fail to land Jeremy Lin if the Knicks match, but also lost Lowry and Dragic (ESPN). With the point guard market dried up, the Rockets have Shaun Livingston at point guard. Now, they will have to contend with the Dallas Mavericks over the scraps left in the point guard market.

Their only hope is that the Knicks are foolish enough not to match, but this is a move Isiah Thomas could not mess up.

Read more NBA news on BleacherReport.com

Go to Source

Jul 032012
 

Remember in 2003 when Jermaine O’Neal signed a seven year, $126.6 million contract with the Indiana Pacers?

Or when the Knicks gave Jerome James $30 million over six years? What about Eddy Curry getting $60 million over six years from Isiah Thomas and the Knicks?

And who can forget Brian Grant’s seven year, $86 million contract with the Heat?

Sadly, every offseason brings a few head-scratchers. And this free agency period, which officially began July 1, is absolutely no different.

The worst offer so far this summer has got to be from the Houston Rockets, who are trying to lure Omer Asik and his 3.1 points and 3.4 rebounds per game away from the Chicago Bulls for a cool $25.1 million over three years. 

Are you kidding me!?

I understand that with more playing time, he should have more touches and thus score more points and grab more rebounds, or at least with that kind of money that’s what will be expected of him.

But for someone who has been in the league for only two seasons, one of which was shortened, it’s certainly a leap of faith on the Rockets’ part. The guy made $1.8 million last year, which is right around what I’d expect someone to make who plays 14 minutes per game.

Does he have some upside? Absolutely. At 7’0″, is he a rare commodity in this league? Asik does all the dirty work and doesn’t mind not being the center of attention, no pun intended.

But he’ll make $15 million in his third year. LeBron got paid virtually the same over one season with the Heat!

I get that the Rockets are in rebuilding mode. They tried their best to load up in the draft and are clearly trying to invest in the future. I like what they’re doing with possibly making Goran Dragic the starting point guard. He’s young, has great court vision, can change directions on a dime, super athletic and fearless.

All I can say is the Rockets are taking a gamble that virtually no other team would take, perhaps not even the Bulls if they chose to not retain their big man from Turkey.

With an offer like this, Asik will go down in the books as either one of the best steals or will be forgotten faster than you think, resurfacing only in discussions about worst free agent signings in league history.

But enough about the Rockets. They’ve clearly made a decision, at least with Asik, to either look like the second-coming of the San Antonio Spurs or the next New York Knicks.

The Minnesota Timberwolves are another team with a questionable move.

Jerry Zgoda of the Boston Herald reported on July 2 that the Wolves are prepared to offer the Portland Trail Blazers swingman Nicolas Batum $50 million over four years.  

Batum made $2.1 million last year. He had a nice season last year with the Blazers, averaging just under 14 points and five rebounds in 30 minutes per game, and shot 45-percent from the field.

I can see why the Wolves would want him. He’d fill their need for two positions, both shooting guard and small-forward and will figure to become a much better scorer playing alongside the great Ricky Rubio.

Watching Batum last season, it was clear he’d be due for a big pay day. He made the most of his time off the bench and you had to wonder what he’d be capable of if given the opportunity to start on a team in rebuilding mode. The Wolves are without a doubt a good fit for him.

But I think something like a 3-year deal worth $25 million…the kind of money Asik would earn…is more appropriate.

Next we have Eric Gordon of the New Orleans Hornets, who is seeking a max-contract worth $58 million over four years.

Is he going to get it? Probably.

Does he deserve it? Not really.

The Hornets will try to keep him from going to the Phoenix Suns, who are also in talks with the guard.

John Reid of The Times-Picayune reported in June that the Hornets are willing to do whatever it takes to retain Gordon, even if it means offering him up to $80 million over five years.

How this makes sense is beyond me.

For one, Gordon is a one-dimensional scorer. There’s not many pure scorers in this league worth of that kind of money.

He averaged a respectable 20 points per game last season for the Hornets, but shot a dismal 25 percent from three. I’m sure the Hornets could go out and find another free agent capable of dropping 20 in a game and doing little else to help his team win for much less than $80 million.

Brandon Rush is a restricted free agent with the Golden State Warriors, but could be worth a look if they don’t sign him. The Hornets could probably get O.J. Mayo, who arguably has a bigger upside than Gordon, for less than what they’re offering.

Lastly, I think the Knicks are in a tough position to give Jeremy Lin as much money as they can or risk losing the support of every fan in the city.

While he was nothing short of spectacular in the 35 games he played for the team last season before going down with season-ending knee surgery, it’s a bit of a stretch to think he’s worth $20 million.

For one, who knows if that dazzling stretch he had was just a fluke? Can he do that over an 82-game season? For multiple seasons?

Let’s assume he is the great player we all thought he’d be. There’s still the question of his health. Will his body hold up? We know what he’s capable of doing, but will his knees allow him to run the point for 35 minutes a game?

Haven’t the Knicks already learned they can’t always jump the gun? See my aforementioned on Jerome James, or virtually any signing under the notorious Isiah Thomas.

I hope Gordon, Batum, Lin and Asik pan out and live up to the lofty expectations that have now been placed on them. I’d rather see them silence critics than fall flat. But there’s bound to be disappointment next season.

And when it comes, don’t act like you didn’t see it coming.

Read more NBA news on BleacherReport.com

Go to Source

Apr 112012
 

The Knicks have had some rough seasons since the Patrick Ewing era ended in 2000. They have been non-competitive, unlikable and downright unwatchable. Fans like me have blamed owner James Dolan for these difficult seasons year after year. Many of his player and personnel decisions were confusing at best (remember the Jerome James fiasco?).

Go to Source

Dec 112011
 

The free agent period has been going at a rapid pace this week. Teams are attempting to make improvements to their roster to achieve the goal of obtaining the Larry O’Brien Trophy. One disturbing thing that happens year after year during the free agent period is the market for big men (centers). 

Teams go overboard in Free Agency when it comes to acquiring big men. The NBA is not what it used to be when it comes to the big fellas. In the 1990s you had Shaquille O’Neal, David Robinson, Hakeem Olajuwon, Patrick Ewing and serviceable big men like Kevin Willis and Vlade Divac. The big men who play in today’s era can’t hold a candle to their predecessors. 

Bad contracts have been a part of the NBA for a very long time. In the 1990s Jon Koncak and Jim McIlvaine were the “poster boys” for marginal big men getting paid big money. In the 2000s guys like Anderson Varejao, Andris Biedrins,  Jerome James and  Brendan Haywood are just a few who have received bloated contracts that did not equal their impact on the basketball court. Jerome James was probably the worst free agent acquisition of the 2000s. James had  a nice 11-game run in the playoffs during the 2004-05 season which led to him being paid. Like many players in a contract year James played his basketball, but it was only for a short period of time. Did they forget about the previous 82 games and the years before that? The New York Knicks gave James a five-year deal worth $30 million.  We all know that James’ tenure in New York was about as short as Verne Troyer, but that is besides the point.

 This offseason NBA officials complained about contracts and how players are paid during the lockout. It seems as if the general managers have not learned so much since the lockout has been resolved. The New York Knicks’ Tyson Chandler was signed to a massive contract worth $56 million over four years. Chandler was the defensive anchor for the Dallas Mavericks during their championship run. Chandler played great ball while playing for Dallas, but Chandler played with a chip on his shoulder because it was a contract year. Tyson Chandler is a solid player and all, but $13 million per season, c’mon now!

I can’t hate on players getting money that they don’t deserve. I blame the owners. If a GM or owner wants to give you an absurd amount of money why not take it?!  Memo to the owners: Spend your money wisely and rather than complain, man up to bad contracts.

Read more NBA news on BleacherReport.com

Go to Source