Nov 292012
 

When the Chicago Bulls acquired Carlos Boozer in 2010, they were hoping to get an elite post player who would help Derrick Rose get to the NBA Finals. Now, Bulls fans are wondering when they can officially give up on him.

What the franchise and fans actually got from Boozer was someone who was nowhere near elite and has underachieved in the playoffs. He went from being a 20-point companion to Deron Williams in the playoffs to a 13-point supplement to Derrick Rose.

At roughly $15 million per year, he’s easily one of the most overpaid players in the NBA from a production and value standpoint.

Boozer’s start to the 2012-13 season has been a continuation of the disappointment and decline, with mediocre point totals and shooting percentages to go along with a career-low PER (16.6).

Many Chicago fans are ready to say “good riddance” to the former All-Star, but when can they actually write him off and give up on him?

I wouldn’t give up on him just yet, because we’ve seen a slight uptick in production of late, and solid per-minute rebounding numbers (11.7 per 36 minutes). But it’s pretty sad that scoring 20-plus is a big deal for him nowadays, as K.C. Johnson notes:

Carlos Boozer’s 28 points in OT win at PHX followed a string of 5 games in which he averaged 8.4 ppg. sulia.com/my_thoughts/82…

— K.C Johnson (@KCJHoop) November 15, 2012

It’s not just the point totals that are unnerving. Boozer is currently notching career-lows in field-goal percentage (46 percent), true shooting percentage (49 percent) and effective field-goal percentage (46 percent).

There’s plenty of time left in the season for him to clean that up, but if he doesn’t improve by Christmas, he’ll fall even farther out of favor with the United Center faithful. 

The 2012-13 season is still young, but Boozer already has five single-digit scoring outings and has eclipsed 20 just three times. 

Boozer is a smart offensive player with excellent footwork, positioning, and a reliable mid-range jump shot. But he lacks dynamic shot-creating moves, mid-air adjustments, and touch off the glass. These deficiencies have been highlighted more than usual by the absence of Rose.

Most importantly, his already mediocre vertical is diminishing.

It’s an aspect of his game that gives reason to believe he’ll never regain elite status and 20-point, 11-rebound production Bulls fans crave. He fails to put pressure on opposing defenses and draw fouls like he used to.

The following clip is a simple display of Boozer’s struggles, as he’s bested by a more athletic Josh Smith and does little to adjust during the play.

In addition to Boozer’s declining offensive value, his defense continues to be spotty and, at times, embarrassing.

His on-ball defense isn’t even the biggest problem. It’s his help defense and pick-and-roll defense that’s problematic.

For an intelligent player who surely understands the concepts of team defense, Boozer often shows a failure to apply the concepts on the court.

He often gets caught flat-footed and is indecisive on screens, and his rim protection is deplorable at times. A few weeks ago, Reggie Miller called him out for lackluster defense against the Thunder, and the following clip from 2011 shows him letting the Heat walk all over him.

I’m not one to rush to judgement, and Bulls fans shouldn’t be hasty in their dismissal of Boozer either. He often incurs negative energy from Chicago fans due to his salary and elevated expectations, which isn’t necessarily fair.

But back-to-back abysmal playoff showings in 2011 and 2012 followed by a subpar November should make them (and more importantly, Tom Thibodeau) nervous.

There are a couple of benchmarks to keep an eye on at New Year’s: If Boozer isn’t shooting 50 percent, scoring more than 16 points per night, and getting to the free-throw line more than three times per night by January, Bulls fans can write him off.

Follow @danielobleacher

Note: Statistics accurate as of 11/28

Read more Chicago Bulls news on BleacherReport.com

Go to Source

Nov 262012
 

Over the past couple seasons, Taj Gibson has become a fan favorite player for the Chicago Bulls, but his lack of production to start the 2012-13 season provides reason to wonder if he’s rapidly becoming overrated.

Prior to the season, Gibson inked a four-year, $38 million extension with the Bulls. This is quite a lucrative contract to be paying a backup power forward, but there wasn’t much reason to question the signing since Gibson has looked splendid the past couple seasons.

Many have even lobbied for Gibson to be inserted into the starting lineup ahead of veteran Carlos Boozer. While Boozer is more adept offensively, he’s not near the defender of Gibson. Further, while Gibson’s offensive game hasn’t flashed much finesse, he is a better finisher near the rim than Boozer.

Therefore, fans and analysts have speculated how Gibson’s numbers would skyrocket once he played consistent minutes. The thought has been that Gibson could potentially average a double-double while also supplying All-Star-caliber defense in the low post. 

But have we gotten ahead of ourselves?

Based on the first 12 games this season, the answer to that question appears to be yes. 

Gibson is currently averaging less points and less rebounds than last season while playing about the exact same minutes per game. Further, his field-goal percentage rests at a measly 43.1 percent, which is beyond unacceptable for a man of his size and athleticism.

This begs us to wonder if he’s becoming overrated. He’s always been a fan favorite because of his defensive prowess and his ability to “posterize” opponents. Bulls fans will never forget when Gibson dunked on Dwyane Wade in the 2011 Eastern Conference finals.

However, on a game-to-game basis, Gibson’s production hasn’t progressed since his rookie season, when he averaged career highs in points and rebounds.

Part of this is because his minutes have been limited due to Boozer’s presence, but Gibson’s overall lack of development is a cause for concern. Is he really fit to be Chicago’s power forward for the future? Was he really worthy to reward with a hefty contract?

An element that cannot be overlooked in this discussion is Chicago’s decision to bring back Gibson but not former Bull Omer Asik, now a member of the Houston Rockets. With so much money already invested in big men (Joakim Noah, Carlos Boozer), the Bulls couldn’t afford to give long-term contracts to both Gibson and Asik.

They thus zeroed in on Gibson and allowed Asik to walk away. Asik was a restricted free agent, and the Bulls could’ve matched the deal Houston offered him, but they knew this would essentially eliminate their hope to retain Gibson. 

Perhaps their decision had logic at the time, but now it’s looking like it lacked sense. It now appears that Gibson is the overrated one of the two, while Asik is the underrated one (or, was the underrated one).

When Asik was in Chicago, fans were quick to complain about his inability to catch and hit free throws, but his numbers in Houston are unquestionably eye-opening (10.2 points per game, 11.9 rebounds per game and 1.3 blocks per outing).

Further, he’s solidified himself as one of the game’s premier defensive centers, if not the premier defensive center. Quite frankly, the Bulls defense this season has not been as formidable as the past couple years. One obvious influence on this has been the absence of Asik.

This all points to the fact that Gibson appears to have been overrated in the NBA world, while Asik has been underrated.

Now it seems like the truth is coming out, and what’s evident is the Bulls likely should’ve kept Asik and potentially traded Gibson prior to the season (while his value remained high and they still could’ve attained some quality pieces in return).

But now the Bulls simply have to hope that Gibson has not hit his peak yet, and that his numbers will begin to dramatically increase. He is being paid like a starter and he should thus produce like one, especially considering the fact that he’s 27 years old and should seemingly be in the thick of his prime.

The discussion should certainly not infer that Gibson’s an unworthy player in the Bulls’ rotation. He still brings plenty to the table, but after netting an extension, the expectations are inevitably raised. As of now, he’s not meeting those expectations, and he doesn’t appear to be taking his game to new levels.

Now is the time for him to break away from the “prospect”-type player who looks fantastic in flashes but lacks consistency. He simply hasn’t broken away from this label and perhaps he never will. Perhaps he will just remain a high-energy reserve who can defend adequately, block shots and score off putbacks. However, his contract is clearly begging for much more.

The bottom line is that Gibson should be having the type of season that exclaims why he should be a starter.

Instead, it’s been the opposite, and there have even been games when Gibson hasn’t logged major minutes. This hasn’t been because coach Tom Thibodeau is riding Carlos Boozer and Joakim Noah too much, but because Gibson wasn’t effectively contributing and thus didn’t deserve to be on the floor.

This trend can’t continue. Gibson must establish himself as a force to be reckoned with on both ends of the floor, and this needs to happen on a steady basis. If it doesn’t, the Bulls are going to be left staring at a contract they never wished they would’ve signed (while also dwelling on how they should’ve actually signed Asik).

Gibson has been a core member of Chicago’s success the past couple seasons, and he will remain a part of their core for years to come. But his production must start rising or else there won’t just be speculation over whether he’s overrated, there will be a consensus that the Bulls’ backup power forward is vastly overpaid.

*Statistics used in this article were as of November 25, 2012.

Read more Chicago Bulls news on BleacherReport.com

Go to Source

Nov 082012
 

Time: Thursday, November 8th, 8 p.m. ET

TV: TNT

Records: Oklahoma City Thunder (2-2) at Chicago Bulls (3-1)

Betting Line: Thunder (-1.5) at Bulls (+1.5) via OddsShark.com

Injuries: Derrick Rose

 

 

Key Storyline: A Tale of Two Ends

Through the first four games of the 2012-13 regular season, the Chicago Bulls and Oklahoma City Thunder have taken similar paths to different results. Both teams have struggled in areas they believed they’d be stronger in, yet only one has a winning record.

Somehow, some way, the Bulls have overcome such deficiencies to reach 3-1. The Thunder, meanwhile, have fallen to 2-2.

For the Bulls, the biggest area of disarray is their three-point shooting. Through four games, they’re knocking down just 26.2 percent of their attempts.

The Thunder, meanwhile, are hitting 41.1 percent of their three-pointers.

For the Thunder, they are committing 17.5 turnovers and forcing just 13.3 per game. The Bulls, however, are coughing it up just 14.0 times and forcing 16.8.

The question is, which team will turn it around?

If the Bulls are able to get their three-pointers to fall and continue to play this smothering defense, they will emerge victorious. If the Thunder are able to play more responsible basketball, however, their ability to light it up from three could lead to victory.

The Bulls must improve their offense. The Thunder must limit their turnovers.

Which team makes the most significant strides will decide who wins.

 

 

Key Matchup: Luol Deng vs. Kevin Durant

There are quality matchups throughout both the Chicago Bulls and Oklahoma City Thunder lineups. With that being said, nothing jumps off of the paper quite like the potential Luol Deng vs. Kevin Durant showdown.

The only question is, where do we end the excitement?

Deng is one of the game’s premier defenders. His combination of size, strength, toughness and fundamentals make him one of the most overwhelming stoppers in the league, which is a direct reason he was an All-Star in 2012.

Durant, meanwhile, is a three-time scoring champion who seems to improve every time he hits the floor. He’s rebounding at a rate of 12.3 boards per game early on, which is greater than expected for a small forward who stands at 6’9″.

The difference for Durant is that he can shoot as well as any player in the NBA. Despite identifying primarily as a jump shooter, Durant posted a 2012 slash line of .496/.387/.860.

We know Deng will not be able to shut down Durant, but can he contain him? If he is able to limit his shot attempts via pressure-man defense, the Bulls can pull this one off.

If Durant is firing on all cylinders, however, it will be very difficult to take the Thunder down.

 

 

X-Factor: Carlos Boozer

It’s a well-known fact that the Chicago Bulls are without superstar point guard Derrick Rose. It has also come to light that both Deng and Joakim Noah will provide consistent scoring.

Unfortunately, the idea that Carlos Boozer is a reliable scoring option has proven to be nothing short of a fallacy.

Boozer started the 2012-13 season with a bang, averaging 18.5 points per game on 62.5 percent shooting from the floor. Unfortunately, the past two games have seen the former Duke Blue Devil average just 8.0 points on 26.9 percent shooting.

Through two games, it appeared as if Boozer had finally become the scorer the Bulls had hoped he’d be when they signed him for $80 million (via ESPN Chicago). The past two outings, however, have reminded Chicago of how inconsistent a player he has become.

Does anyone else know why they haven’t turned to the pick-and-roll as their primary source of offense? Seems like that would be a good idea considering Boozer’s All-Star caliber success with the play.

Regardless of what the past may tell us, Boozer remains a key piece of the Bulls’ postseason puzzle. Against the Oklahoma City Thunder, his value will be on full display.

If he is able to overcome shot blocking guru Serge Ibaka, the Bulls will be in prime position to earn a victory. If he continues to struggle to find the bottom of the net, however, Chicago will fall victim to their second loss in two games.

 

 

Prediction:

The Chicago Bulls’ team defense is the best in the NBA. The numbers show it, as they limited teams to a league-best 88.2 points per game in 2012.

NBA general managers believe it, as well, as 40 percent of league executives voted Chicago as the best defensive unit (via NBA.com).

With that being said, there is only so much you can do when faced with the likes of Durant and Russell Westbrook. Although the numbers may show that the Bulls could contain them, a box score cannot measure fourth-quarter contributions.

At this point in time, there is no one better for those type of situations than Durant. Worst of all for the Bulls, Durant is due for a big fourth-quarter performance.

Through four games, Durant is averaging just 20.8 points on 15.0 shots per game. His rebounding and facilitating statistics are sitting pretty at 12.3 boards and 5.8 assists, but he is not playing the aggressive style of scoring that the Thunder would like him to.

Against the Bulls, we can expect Durant to shoot the ball at least 20 times as he and Deng battle for supremacy.

With this being established, the Bulls’ greatest weakness will be exposed. As Durant steps up and pours in the points during the fourth quarter, the Bulls will realize they have no go-to player with the game on the line.

Unless Richard Hamilton discovers his mid-2000s form, that won’t change. OKC wins a nail-biter.

 

Oklahoma City Thunder 94, Chicago Bulls 89

Read more Chicago Bulls news on BleacherReport.com

Go to Source

Nov 072012
 

The Chicago Bulls are a team that could contend for a championship already, but they have an Achilles heel in that they have but one superstar, Derrick Rose. They might be able to win without him in the regular season, and they can possibly win with just him in the postseason, but to win multiple championships they need someone to help him. 

Carlos Boozer was supposed to be that player, and he hasn’t worked out so well. While he offers more help than some credit him for, it’s not enough, which is why he is criticized. Luol Deng has the heart, but not the ball-handling skills, to be a superstar. 

Joakim Noah may be emerging as the Bulls star without Rose, but it’s hard to envision him as the second player who can handle the ball and take the pressure off of Rose when opponents put the trap on him. 

Here are five ideas of players who could help the Bulls and Rose, the link to verify the trade proposal would work, and the pros and cons of each trade for each team. Remember, though, you have to give something to get something, and you have to give something other teams want. 

Begin Slideshow

Go to Source